WARNING TO DEFENDANTS (DEBTORS) NAMED IN CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS

CRIMINAL LAWS SPECIFICALLY AWARDING DAMAGES FOR VIOLATION OF CITIZENS’ CIVIL RIGHTS

18 USC § 241 Conspiracy Against Rights

18 USC § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

Misprision Definition: (1) Mal-administration of Public Office. (2) Neglect in preventing or reporting a crime. Source: American Heritage Dictionary of the English language –New College Edition copyright 1980 by Houghton Mifflin Company

Misprision Definition:  to do wrong; (1) Misconduct, esp. in office or in neglect of duty.  (2) mistake.  Contempt; scorn.  Source:  Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary – A Merriam-Webster copyright 1956 by G. & C. Merriam Co., Publishers

18 USC § 4 Misprision of Felony: Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

WHEN FEDERAL JUDGES AND U.S. PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS DISHONOR, RIDICULE, & TREAT WITH CONTEMPT THEIR OWN TITLE 18 STATUES, WHICH REGULATE THEIR PROFESSION, THEY DISABLE AND DESTROY THE MEANING OF THE CRIMINAL SYSTEM AND ALL OF ITS FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND DIS-ENGAGE THEMSELVES FROM THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LEAVING THE NATION OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ENTIRELY DEPENDANT UPON THEIR OWN MEANS OF SELF-DEFENSE INCLUDING DUELING AND RESORTING TO FIREARMS WITHOUT RECOURSE.

LET US TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT THIS MEANS

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms (Anything equivalent to what the Military Possesses) is the  Citizens’ Right to protect oneself when the Government cannot and/or refuses to protect the Citizen. Title 18 USC § 4 is the counter-balance to the Citizens’ Right to Keep and Bear Arms. If the Citizen cannot complain to the Government in a Criminal matter, then he has to be able to defend himself, without limit.  

The Defendant (Debtor) is being denied assistance of “Due Process of Law” by the Federal Judges & U. S. Prosecuting Attorneys, who are refusing to provide the Defendant (Debtor) a Trial by Jury, so that he has an opportunity to clear his name of the Criminal charges so named against him in the Criminal Complaint.

This means that the Federal Government, by the DISHONOR, RIDICULE,AND CONTEMPT FOR PROCESS  by its Agents, has given up all Authority to deal with the Criminal Charges of the case, now and later. The Citizen now may bring prosecution and seek Remedy pursuant to  Commercial Law (Contract Law), which is the Peaceable Remedy left to the Citizen, guaranteed under the 1^st Amendment of the United States Constitution of America, and a protection guaranteed under the 2^nd Amendment, Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

“Do not let anyone claim to be a True American, if they ever attempt to remove religion from politics…. Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is a Force, like Fire: A dangerous servant and a terrible master…. The very atmosphere of fire arms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference----- they deserve a place of Honor with all that is Good.”---- George Washington, 1^st President of the United States of America

“COMMERCIAL LAW” (Contract Law) provides for various PUBLIC COMMERCIAL TAX REBATE LIENS TO COMBAT MAL-PROCESS, MALFEASCEANCE, and Misprision of felony VALUED BY REFERENCE TO VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE to be used to make collection for Civil Rights damages on behalf of the Public caused by the Defendant (Debtor).

The Criminal Complaints being used are being evaluated by an application of 1976 values of 18 USC §§ 241 & 242. These 1976 values are not inflated in these Criminal Complaints. Therefore, no one can complain that they are excessive.

If the IRS, which is a Private Entity, can use Commercial Law every day to make collections by illegally using a NOTICE OF LIEN, then every Private Citizen may utilize Commercial Law to provide for Remedy against Civil Rights violations and make collections for damages by proper use of NOTICE OF LIEN followed by ACTUAL LIEN upon expiration of the three months (Jewish/International Commercial Law) (Statutory 90-day) grace period.

FOLLOWING ARE THE OPTIONS OF “DUE PROCESS OF LAW” LEFT TO DEFENDANT (DEBTOR) UPON DISHONOR, RIDICULE, AND CONTEMPT FOR PROCESS BY FEDERAL JUDGES AND U.S. PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS

Defendant (Debtor) now must personally respond by sworn Counter-Affidavit properly rebutting each charge point-by-point showing “Just Cause” Specifically why the Criminal Charges are not true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, if such be the case.

If Defendant (Debtor) responds, but fails to respond by sworn Affidavit specifically stating their Counter-Affidavit is true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, it shall be considered a Non-response, Dishonor, and Default.

The burden of the proof of the Criminal Charges and follow up Lien(s) rests on the Affiant/Accuser/Lien Claimant, unless the Defendant/Debtor gives up/abandons or fails to contest the charges/claims. The Basic Rule is: He who leaves the Battle first, loses by Default.

Please understand that the Affiant/Accuser/Lien Claimant would prefer that the Defendant/ Debtor would be Innocent.  These Processes have not been created for personal gain, but have been instituted for the Peace and Dignity of the Public.

The Commercial values are established by reference to the United States Code Law Title 18 (U.S.C./ USC), and, consequently, are Commercial Instruments of value, therefore, making them OBLIGATIONS OF VALUE known as SECURITIES. Such Commercial Securities Instruments are governed by Title 15 United States Code, and overseen by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (U.S.S.E.C./USSEC).

If any Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) believes any of this Commercial Process to be False, said Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s) is required by their own respective government systems to produce Affidavit(s) specifically showing “Just Cause” with Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law to support their Specific disagreement claims, and these Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law must be sworn to be true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and be available for Public Inspection by the Court of Public opinion of the people/Citizens of this Nation. Anything less shall be considered a Non-Response, Dishonor, and Default on the part of the Judge, Public Official, and/or Military Officer(s), and an evasion of Due Process.

Respond to:

Randy Due --Ex military (Civil Rights Advocate) Non-union Lawyer pursuant to 42 USC 1986

179 Green St. E.

Pelham, Georgia 31779

(229) 294-6112

duze24@bellsouth.net                                                 September 22, 2012