Embracing the Bonds of Slavery once again

“A far better choice, in our view, is to expand the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences” ; such as birth control and access to abortions. John Holdren, presidential advisor.

During the early 20^th century many philosophical evils were masked to hide their bearers in safe haven amongst the supposed intellectual elite, and to this day I can’t understand the overwhelming percentage of the black population that herald their followers to present day. If I were cynical I would say that it appears that the black community by and large has suicidal tendencies, and would prefer the bonds of slavery and extermination over freedom and liberty; along with self reliance. If you trek through the history of the progressive movement and look to their ‘founders’, the logical explanation would be what I just stated; and then we would ask…why? Why do the majority of blacks vote for people that have their extermination, if not impediment in mind; simply to accrue power? You may think me wrong on this, but I’ll back up every statement; and then you can draw your own conclusion.

Woodrow Wilson was probably the most blatanty racist and whitely supreme in his ‘progressive’ thought and outward actions. Upon inauguration Wilson fired any black federal employees, and segregated the Navy; which up until then had always been desegregated. This naval policy stood in effect into the 1950’s. He held a private viewing of the movie “The Birth of a Nation”, which helped to spawn the modern KKK movement that still rears it’s head from time to time. Wilson stated frankly “The white men were roused by a mere instinct of self preservation… until at last there had sprung into existence a great Ku Klux Klan, a veritable empire of the South, to protect the Southern country.” Wilson stood by those words and in fact, the Klans popularity thrived thanks in part to the support it received from the highest office in the land.

Exhibit 2 offers up Margaret Sanger. Ah, Yes…Margaret Sanger , the Birth of Feminism. Stalwart for womens rights and touted as the goddess of the abortionists and planned parenthood organizations across the country. In March 1925 at an international birth control gathering in New York City, Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League (ABCL), warned of the menace posed by the “black” and “yellow” peril. The ABLC, along with other groups eventually became known as Planned Parenthood.

Other Sanger colleagues included self avowed racists. Lothrop Stoddard, was a Harvard graduate. He wrote of The Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy. This guy was a Nazi enthusiast who espoused the eugenics of the Third Reich as “scientific” and “humanitarian.” And another Sanger associate, Dr. Harry Laughlin, spoke of purifying America’s human “breeding stock” and of purging America’s “bad strains.” Among those “strains” were “shiftless, ignorant, and worthless class of antisocial whites of the South.”

Sanger herself spoke of sterilizing those she condemned as “unfit,” this was a plan that she said would be the “salvation of American civilization.” She also spoke of those individuals who were “irresponsible and reckless,” this class included people ” whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers.” Further contending, “there is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.” Many blacks constituted a segment of the population that Sanger considered “unfit.”

Planned Parenthood’ and it’s apologists try to distance themselves from the eugenics and birth control movements; history definitively says otherwise. The eugenic theme was expressly highlighted in the Birth Control Review, which Sanger founded in 1917. She published the following articles: “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925), “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928), along with many others. Now, there’s more on this woman; but to continue would require “volumes” of written essay. I think I’ve covered enough on her to make my case.

Next on the list would be? Justice to the Supreme Court, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. Holmes wrote for the majority in the 1927 Supreme Court case of Buck v. Bell, upholding the right of state governments to forcibly sterilize “feebleminded’’ citizens as he put it:

“It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. . . Three generations of imbeciles are enough.’’

Holmes considered such brutal thinking progressive and enlightened; Stating to a friend he said “it gave me pleasure, to pen a decision upholding compulsory sterilization.”

What fantastically, fabulous, forward thinking~…my god.

Moving on here, lets go with Richard Nixon and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Nixon was meeting with an aide in the White House on Jan. 23, 1973. When the conversation turned to the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision the day before, Nixon said it was “necessary’’ in some cases, such as interracial pregnancies. “There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white; Or rape.’’

Ginsburg’s had these chilling words: Referring to the Hyde Amendment (which bars medicaid funds for abortions), “Reproductive choice has to be straightened out. Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. So that Roe was going to be then set up for Medicaid funding for abortion. . . But when the court decided McRae, the case came out the other way.’’

Populations that we don’t want to have too many of ?- who would those be, exactly? Minorities? The poor? The handicapped? She said this in 1980 by the way.

Now Sanger called for “immediate, stern, and definite’’ action to solve the “problem of the feeble-minded and the menace of the moron’’; those that she regarded as the “dead weight of human waste.’’ She was absolutely opposed to providing free medical care to “slum mothers,’’ because that “would facilitate . . . maternity among the very classes in which the absolute necessity is to discourage it.’’ Although not a racist in her personal life, there is no denying the racial aspect of her campaign. In 1939, for example, she launched the “Negro Project’’ which was aimed at curtailing black childbirth in the South.

Date: 1993. Decades after Wilson and Sanger; the eugenicist mindset lives on. As co-counsel for the appellants in Roe, Ron Weddington wrote in a letter to President-elect Bill Clinton in January 1993, challenging him to “start immediately to eliminate the barely educated, unhealthy and poor segment of our country’’, not through “some sort of mass extinction, but with massive birth control and abortion. Condoms alone won’t do it . . . Government is also going to have to provide vasectomies, tubal ligations, and abortion . . . We don’t need more poor babies.’’

Today (2010), abortion ends more black lives than heart disease, cancer, accidents, AIDS, and violent crime combined. And more than half of all black pregnancies in America end in abortion. Clearly that wasn’t what Justice Ginsburg meant by “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.’’ Or was it? Really?…hmmm, perhaps indeed.

OK…Lets take a history break here. Did You Know? In 1964, During the Civil Rights Bill debate; The chief opponents were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, of later Watergate fame, Albert Gore Sr., and Robert Byrd. Senator Byrd, a former Klansman whom Democrats still call “the conscience of the Senate”, filibustered against the civil rights bill for fourteen straight hours before the final vote. The House of Representatives passed the bill by 289 to 126, a vote in which 79% of Republicans and 63% of Democrats voted yes. The Senate vote was 73 to 27, with 21 Democrats and only 6 Republicans voting no. President Johnson signed the new Civil Rights Act into law on July 2, 1964.

I know this is getting long, and thanks for bearing with me. Given the history I’ve outlined thus far, why in Gods name does the majority of the black community feel compelled to blindly give their alegience to people that clearly want them eliminated? Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger, Justice Olive Wendell Holmes, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Al Gore Sr., Robert Byrd; all of a bygone generation…coupled with the ‘new breed’ of progressives to pick up their causes.

During the run up to the 2008 election, Hillary Clinton mocked people with her “I ain’t no ways tired” black southern drawl; and later high praise for Margaret Sanger. Joe Bidens “clean and articulate” comment, Harry Reids “Light Skinned” and Lacking “Negro Dialect” comments on Obama. Even the Media with Chris Matthews velvet draped racism saying that “I forgot he was black for an hour” after the state of the union address, referring to the president.

These champion progressive liberals that the black population swarms around and carries water for, have done nothing but try to keep them herded in manageable, needy groups in the inner cities…but they’ve also been the ones driving the ‘bus full o’ negroes’ right off the economic cliff by keeping them unemployed, uneducated, and unable to think for themselves out of a sense of entitlement.

The progressives are the new slave owners of our society; laughing all the way back to their elected seat of power, and too the bank in the process.

chAos,

Founder, c4coalition.com